Volume I · Jobs & Progress · Lesson 1

Same Rows, Different Question

A week of segmenting three thousand accounts by company size, and every segment looks the same.

Lesson 015 minFoundations

Judgment0 judgment

←→ to move through the storySwipe or use the arrows to move through the story

01 / 13

Read this lesson as text

The whole story in one page — 13 frames, about 5 minutes.

Same Rows, Different Question — Volume I, Understanding Humans Before Products · Jobs & Progress · Investigation · Foundations. Company-size segments show nothing across three thousand accounts, and re-cutting the identical rows by what each user was trying to finish that day produces a clean split

  1. 01 · Opening

    Same Rows, Different Question

    A week of segmenting three thousand accounts by company size, and every segment looks the same.

  2. 02 · The setup

    Sam has spent a week on the segmentation and comes back with nothing, which he is honest enough to say.

    Sam: Small, medium, large. Every segment behaves the same. There is no story in it.

  3. 03 · The setup

    Week-4 retention by company size — Under 20 staff: 42%; 20 to 200: 44%; Over 200: 41%; Accounts: 3,010

  4. 04 · The evidence

    Maya: That is a real finding. Company size does not predict anything here.

    Sam: It is the only cut the tool gives me.

  5. 05 · You make the call

    Retention is 42, 44 and 41 percent across company sizes. What is the most useful conclusion?

    The story does not tell you first.

    A. Size does not predict retention here, and a different cut of the same rows might

    B. Something common to every customer drives retention, so segmenting is pointless

    C. Collect more profile data, such as industry and region

  6. 06 · What happened

    Maya reads twenty of the first-week support conversations and stops sorting people by who they are.

    Maya thinks: Every one of these opens with something they were trying to finish that day.

  7. 07 · What happened

    Maya: Can we tag each account by the first thing they completed rather than by how big they are?

    Priya: Same three thousand rows. Different column.

  8. 08 · What happened

    The identical accounts, sorted by the job they arrived with.

    Week-4 retention by first job completed — Reported to someone else: 71%; Replaced a spreadsheet: 63%; Explored, no clear task: 18%; Accounts: 3,010

  9. 09 · What happened

    Sam: Seventy-one against eighteen. That was sitting in the data the whole time.

    Maya: It was. It just needed a different question asked of it.

  10. 10 · What happened

    People arrive with a job, not with a profile

    Demographics describe who someone is. They are easy to collect, they are what every analytics tool offers by default, and they are frequently unrelated to what a person is trying to get done on the day they meet your product.

    A job is a situation with a deadline attached — reporting to a manager on Friday, replacing the spreadsheet that broke last week. Two companies of wildly different sizes can arrive with the identical job, which is why the size cut flattened a real difference into noise.

    Nothing was missing from the data. The rows were the same three thousand rows both times. What changed was the question, and that is usually cheaper than collecting anything new.

  11. 11 · What happened

    Dev: So we build for the reporting job.

    Maya: Or we work out how to give the eighteen percent a job on their first day.

  12. 12 · What happened

    The first-run screen starts by asking what the user came to finish, and the eighteen percent stops being a category.

    Maya thinks: A week of segmentation and the answer was one column we already had.

  13. 13 · Complete

    Same Rows, Different Question

    A flat segmentation often means the wrong question rather than an absent effect, and re-cutting costs nothing. Next: the competitor that never appears in a competitive analysis because it has no website.