Volume I · Seeing Reality
The Users Who Aren't There8 min
0 judgment
Judgment
0
+200-15
The Users Who Aren't There — frame 1
Volume I · Seeing Reality · Lesson 1

The Users Who Aren't There

Maya surveys her active users to explain churn, ships the top request, and learns the people who could have answered had already left

01 / 16
Opening01 / 16

Read this lesson as text

The whole story in one page — 16 frames, about 8 minutes.

The Users Who Aren't There — Volume I, Understanding Humans Before Products · Seeing Reality · Failure & recovery · Foundations. Maya surveys her active users to explain churn, ships the top request, and learns the people who could have answered had already left

  1. 01 · Opening

    The Users Who Aren't There

    Maya surveys her active users to explain churn, ships the top request, and learns the people who could have answered had already left

  2. 02 · The setup

    Maya has been a PM for three years. Churn is up four points this quarter, and nobody can say why.

  3. 03 · The setup

    Priya: Churn is up four points. I need to know why before the board asks me.

  4. 04 · The evidence

    Maya: I'll ask the users. A few hundred responses will tell us what's broken.

  5. 05 · The evidence

    Four hundred and twelve responses. An average score of 4.6. One request louder than all the rest.

    Q3 Satisfaction Survey (survey-results) — Responses: 412; Average score: 4.6 / 5; Top request: Bulk export

  6. 06 · The evidence

    Sam: Four point six! They love us. Build the bulk export and churn takes care of itself.

  7. 07 · The evidence

    So she built it. Six weeks of engineering, shipped on a Thursday, announced in the changelog.

  8. 08 · The evidence

    Churn did not move. It got worse.

    Priya: Bulk export shipped six weeks ago. Churn is up another point.

  9. 09 · The evidence

    Four hundred people had told her what to build. She had built exactly that. It changed nothing.

  10. 10 · The evidence

    Dev: Quick question. The survey — where did it actually run?

    Maya: In the app. A banner after login.

  11. 11 · The evidence

    The people who had left could not see a banner inside a product they had already stopped opening.

    Dev: So everyone who answered was, by definition, still logging in.

  12. 12 · The evidence

    You cannot learn why people leave from the people who stayed

    Every study has a door. An in-app banner only reaches people who still open the app, so a survey about churn built that way excludes, by construction, every person it is about.

    The 412 answers were not wrong. They answered a different question: what would make an already-satisfied user slightly more satisfied.

  13. 13 · The evidence

    The Sample Gap (1.0)

    Who could have answered this? — Name the population the question is actually about — not the one you have access to.

    Who actually answered? — Describe the sample honestly, including how they were reached. The method is part of the sample.

    Who is missing, and would they disagree? — If the missing group would have answered differently, what you have is not evidence.

  14. 14 · You make the call

    Maya's survey ran as an in-app banner. Whose answers could it never have collected?

    The story does not tell you first.

    A. Users who found the survey annoying

    B. Users who had already cancelled

    C. Users on the free plan

  15. 15 · What happened

    They talked about onboarding. All nine of them.

    Maya: I emailed thirty cancelled accounts. Nine replied. Not one mentioned exports.

  16. 16 · Complete

    The Users Who Aren't There

    Nine people changed her roadmap. Next: how many is enough, and when a sample stops being an anecdote.